[] [] [Contact]
[Services]
[Officers]
[Membership]
[Member Pages]
[Gold Star Program]
[Gold Star Litters]
[Gold Star Studs]
[Vet Certificate]
[Club Documents]
[AKC / FSS]
[UKC]
[MEOE / MMK]
[Other Clubs]
[Home Page]
[Sitemap]
[0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 640 480]
[0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 640 480]
[Mudi The Name]
[Articles]
[Breed Handouts]
[Colors]
[Health]
[History]
[Standard]
[Links]
[BulletinBoard]
[Events]
[Useful Info]
[Breed/Owner Compatibility]
[Finding A Breeder]
[Choosing Your Mudi]
[American Mudis]
[Breeder Directory]
[Rescue]
[Standard]
[]
[]
[]

Basic Standard Changes from 1936, 1966, 2000 of the FCI Standard

  

 

1936
Dr. Fényes

1966
Dr. Balassy

2000

COLORS

Black, Blue Merle, Brown Merle, all other colors except tri-color and big black patches on white background with defined edges

1937 - all solid and merle colors

 

Black, White, sometimes many colored, pied (black-white) or white-black, multicolored with evenly distributed spots, pepite

1992 - MEOE allows brown color

 

Black, Blue Merle, Ash, Brown, White and Fakó

Presently no brown merle or ashbrown (graybrown) but these colors are shown and allowed to be bred and registered as accepted colors in Hungary.

 

SIZES

Males    40-50 cm
Bitches  35-45 cm
and 30-50 cm as a whole breed 

No Sex difference made 35-47 cm

Males     41-47 cm
(Ideal 43-45)

Bitches   38-44 cm
(Ideal 40-42)

 


Dr. Fényes, the founder of the breed wrote in 1937, every color is allowed, it can be ash (gray), fakó (yellow), red (with red nose), brown (with brown nose) or any other solid color or merle.

1966 - Dr. Balassy was given the task to re-write the standard given his ideals for the breed and what he found left of it after the wars.  As he only examined less than a handful of dogs by his own words, these are what he mostly based his standard on.  His interpretation of the merle color and the following translation of it left much to be desired as you can see and partly why the standard was re-written in 2000.

1992 - MEOE breeding control decided in Hungary brown color was allowed.

2004 - FCI added Fakó color to standard.  Fakó was not included in the Hungarian or other translated versions unintentionally.  Fakó dogs should have dark pigment, not flesh or liver colored or spotted, as is required in the white, black and black merle colors.  FCI translated Fakó to Fawn in the English version of the Mudi standard.  Aggressive and overly shy dogs became a disqualifying fault, as does albinism. 

2004 - In America, since we are not an FCI country, we have the important responsibility to make the standard for the Mudi.  We have the opportunity to correct some inconsistencies and ambiguous language to make the standard easier to interpret and fulfill the Americans desire to return to the original founders descriptions of the breed.  This includes mostly the inclusion of all solid and merle colors and the nearest conversion to inches from the centimeter to the next larger inch. 

It is not possible to accurately measure a dog that is 44 cm to the actual equivalent in inches of 17 and 5/16's inches.  Size should only be a fault, not a disqualification, quality should never be sacrificed for size, especially since Dr. Fényes's sizes vary so widely. 

The weights vary according to each dog given bone and muscle content, these are the minimum sizes and to be used only as baseline information.  (No Mudi is ever weighed in the conformation ring or the breeding exam.) 

The merle pattern is the only accepted pattern and is more accurately described to eliminate confusion and importing or breeding of incorrectly colored and/or registered dogs.

It is the AMA and Americans belief that a Mudi should look like a Mudi, not a Border Collie, Australian Shepherd, Belgian Malinois, Doberman Pinscher or Keeshond. These breeds allow tri patterns, masked, black and tan, brown and tan, wolf and irish spotting patterns, the FCI and AMA Mudi Standard does not.  The properly colored merle is the only allowable pattern and solid colors are the only accepted colors.

  

(click on the title to read or open the PDF)

FCI and AMA Standard Comparison

Based on the FCI 9/11/2004 and

AMA 9/1/2004 Standards

FCI Link
Return to the Top of the Page